User talk:Kronikerdelta
Welcome
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Bouncywikilogo.gif/50px-Bouncywikilogo.gif)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Sockpuppetry case against you
[edit]FYI. Basket of Puppies 01:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Go away, liar. δiji.broke.it. 03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 04:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Making threats
[edit]Making threats is likely to get you blocked indefinitely. Instead, I suggest you can try contacting the Wikimedia Foundation, through WP:OTRS. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Telling you that I'm going to get other editors involved if you don't fix the problem YOU created is clearly not a threat. Frankly I don't care. I'm going to inform the administration of the school that this foundations representatives (namely you) are acting in bad faith in producing libel about them. It takes 30 seconds to go to the source and then fix the problem. You've spent more time harassing me than it would have taken to fix it in the first place. WHY WON'T YOU ACT IN GOOD FAITH AND READ THE SOURCE? δiji.broke.it. 05:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- This comment appears to violate our policy No Legal Threats, I suggest you immediately retract this one and the similar threat you made on ANI[1], or you will be blocked. Additionally, your uncivil comments to Cirt are totally unwarranted and inappropriate, Cirt did the absolute right thing in protecting the article. I strongly suggest you retract those comments as well, and if you continue that behavior, you will be blocked for that. Dreadstar ☥ 05:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not making a legal threat! I have no ground on which to even pursue a legal case against you! I'm telling you that I am going make the schools administrative staff aware of the problem. Libel is libel whether it is on a wiki or not. I will not retract anything because this is completely warranted. You are obviously stating a mistruth. δiji.broke.it. 05:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- I've blocked you for violating Wikipedia:No legal threats, per the discussion here and your comment immediately above, contrary to your assertion, your comment "I'm telling you that I am going make the schools administrative staff aware of the problem. Libel is libel whether it is on a wiki or not. " is indeed a clear legal threat. Dreadstar ☥ 05:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not making a legal threat! I have no ground on which to even pursue a legal case against you! I'm telling you that I am going make the schools administrative staff aware of the problem. Libel is libel whether it is on a wiki or not. I will not retract anything because this is completely warranted. You are obviously stating a mistruth. δiji.broke.it. 05:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- This comment appears to violate our policy No Legal Threats, I suggest you immediately retract this one and the similar threat you made on ANI[1], or you will be blocked. Additionally, your uncivil comments to Cirt are totally unwarranted and inappropriate, Cirt did the absolute right thing in protecting the article. I strongly suggest you retract those comments as well, and if you continue that behavior, you will be blocked for that. Dreadstar ☥ 05:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Fuck off δiji.broke.it. 05:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- By the way if you bother to look at my original complain I am 100% vindicated. Neutral editor bothered to look at the source and corrected the problem. δiji.broke.it. 06:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- RUN CHECKUSER, I AM NOT A SOCK!!! δiji.broke.it. 06:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- That always means they are. Island Monkey talk the talk 07:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- RUN CHECKUSER, I AM NOT A SOCK!!! δiji.broke.it. 06:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Asking to run checkuser proves my guilt? Really? Why don’t you run it and see if facts and not your made up crap proves me guilty. δiji.broke.it. 05:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Socks frequently protest their innocence, although protesting innocence is not automatically evidence of socking. Meanwhile, you might have a chance at reinstatement if you were to retract and renounce anything you've said that looks like a legal threat whether so intended or not. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 06:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC)